Just one of Those Coincidences

Good old Disney tries to get more Doctor Who into our every day-lives.
Do you know the opening line of its (Disney's) latest ... erm, masterpiece? 'Tangled'?

It's: 'This is the story of how I died...'

What happened to good old 'Once upon a time'? Old fashioned? Maybe... So 'borrowing' the opening words of the most over-rated Doctor Who finale (I dare to put an optimistic 'ever' after this) seem to be more up to date.

Still, I don't think RTD is going to write them a letter...

Every Doctor, Every Me...

That was actually good, or is it only the nostalgia coming through?

It wasn't a surprise that part 2 of The Death of the Doctor (link) was better than part 1 because that's where the actual story took place, just like in last year's The Wedding of Sarah Jane. Basically, it even had the same structure, with the Doctor doing a lot of dashing between two places and running as about a year ago.

Nevertheless, this time it was different, in a brilliant way. For if there is one thing RTD is good at, then it's reuniting companions. Sure, there was a bit of a lot hugging and and all that stuff going on, but I suppose that's just the way people are.

I'm glad that this time RTD even addressed the 'why didn't you come back' question, which is not the easiest one to answer, I guess. But RTD handled it in one of the best ways possible. We some sort of suspected Ten going back to each of his former 'companions' before regenerating, and RTD just told us what we wanted to hear. I think also the line 'I don't look back, because I can't...' didn't take many of us by surprise (although we may want to attach an 'Explanation Needed' sign to it.)

Still, there were at least two things fans won't be too found of. First, how that Memory Wave device could have worked in the first place, because even New-Who fans might know that the Doctor uses to change the TARDIS key here and then. So Jo and Sarah Jane weren't exactly remembering the same key. Additionally, why didn't the Doctor just snap his fingers for opening the TARDIS to save them? We know that he knows that he can do that...

The second thing was RTD's attempt of rewriting the good old regeneration rule. In my humble opinion RTD didn't rewrote any sort of canon, because the Doctor was obviously lying. It isn't the first time that he would do that when confronted with a let's call it rather unpleasant question. He just didn't want them to worry about him too much. Besides, he also didn't told Jo about Gallifrey not existing anymore.*

However, all in all, this turned out to be a surprisingly enjoyable episode. Sure, we have to take in account that The Sarah Jane Adventures isn't only officially made for children. It actually IS made for them.
And RTD, thanks for the Doctor not taking himself too seriously. 'Cos between you and me, if that day ever comes, I think the whole universe might just shiver.' is the perfect amount of drama all of his episodes should have.

_________

* EDIT: By the way, Russel T Davies himself encourages us in this SFX interview not to take that '5o7 statement' too seriously.

Russel T Davies can't keep his Hands off Doctor Who

According to this Digital-Spy article RTD is about to deal with one of the most important question of Doctor Who, namely, how many lives does the Doctor really have... However, RTD isn't going to deal with this in that TV series which's main-elements he is going to re-write, but in that show's The Sarah Jane Adventures - spin-off.
Disappointed?

Me too.

Maybe not the worst possible send off of the best Doctor we very likely are ever going to have

Sometimes I wonder what is on scriptwriters' minds  while writing an episode. Maybe RTD had a check-list with topics which a good episode should include and ticked them off as he was including them. That may be the reason why the whole story seems a bit overloaded. Nevertheless, yes, we had our promised regeneration, yes, there were scenes which were good, deep and dramatic, and maybe RTD asks us to forget about the rest. Actually I would really love to forget about "the rest" and each of "Part 1"'s 75 minutes as well. But I have to admit, "Part 2" could have been worse; a lot worse.
Still, I can't help being a bit disappointed. It was David Tennant's last episode and I expected more, not from him, he and Bernhard Cribbins did an amazing job, actually it's them saving this episode from being torn into pieces by review writers; but from  Davies.  At least it was also RTD's last attempt to do his best.

I mean, on the one hand we had a few "overdone" scenes, come on RTD, you can't expect us taking you seriously after we saw the Doctor crashing through that giant glass dome from that height. And the "prophet" of the Time Lords was rather a spoof of something with which I haven't come across yet, not to mention that very "playstation-like" situation when those missiles hunt the alien space craft.

But to be fair, on the other hand it wasn't bad enough to deserve the adjective "bad". And to be even fairer no matter how good this last episode would have possibly been it wouldn't have been good enough to be the "swan song" of the 1oth Doctor.  And noone can deny that there were very "Doctor"-ish moments one has to fell in love with: The Doctor correcting Wilf's grammar followed by the "worst rescue ever!" scene put a smile on my face.* For me the most emotional scenes were Wilf and the Doctor having that chat in the space craft and when the Doctor explains to the Master the big privilege of SEEING that universe out there. I think these were the moments fans loved the most, mainly due to some great acting performance. And these were also the scenes missing in "Part 1".

So, I'm not saying it's RTD's worst script, it surely isn't, but it's also not his best one and that's because it might be impossible to write a really bad regeneration scene. Well, 1oth last line "I don't want to go." wasn't such a great idea. He is a Time Lord knowing he is just about to regenerate so it doesn't really make a lot of sense...

Then again, 11th's first line wasn't better. "I have legs!" Wow. Who can we blame for that one, was that Moffat's or RTD's line?** I have to admit, the last time we had "new teeth, that's weird." - it's hard to top that and I'm serious for a change. Talking about Matt Smith. If (some) of those explosions taking place in the TARDIS were real, and they really looked like that, then this was very likely Matt Smith most difficult shot of his entirely "Doctor Who" career. But apartf rom this I think we don't know enough about his Doctor's character or Matt's acting abilities to say something substantive about number 11 but for his first appearance this wasn't bad.

Anyway, back to the episode. There were also a few nice twists, especially when we realised that after all the Doctor will have to sacrifice his life to save Wilfed. I didn't have tears in my eyes, but when Wilf started tapping, I bet it wasn't just me who thought "Wilf, just stop it!". This was maybe one of the best done moments in DW's history ever.

Plus, I understand why RTD wanted the Doctor visiting his more or less companions. It wasn't really my taste, although "The Journal of Impossible Things" scene was an extraordinary idea. It was a bit sad, even sadder than RTD's "1o minute before the end" scene. At least she got her happy life, while he, well... we know. Then, Rose was a bit pointless. I understand why she was there, and I have no idea how it could have been done better, still, I can't help thinking it wasn't a necessary scene. Oh, and Martha and Mickey are married? Nice for them.

So, all in all it was nice and sad, there are certainly explanations missing*** but I have to say finally it wasn't the "worst possible send off" of the best Doctor we very likely are ever going to have. And that's one of the biggest compliments RTD has ever got from me.

___________

* I'm ignoring the fact that that escape scene had to be filmed as well. I'm curious to see the confidential explaining how they actually did that stuff with those stairs....

**It's Moffat's. Well...

*** like was that woman really the Doctor's mother? Was she a Time Lady in the first place? Becuase, if yes, then how could she scape the timelock? She spoke to Wilf a few times and if she were really from Gallifrey she couldn't have done that. Maybe we'll never find out about it but review writers who can't write TARDIS properly or refer to the Doctor as "Doctor Who" shouldn't be speculating about such things. Then, what about the Oods? I hope Moffat has an idea for them. Oh, and what happened really to the Master?

Intention: Fun and Wobbeling Around with Time

I know it's odd to give my review about the most dramatical Doctor Who episode so far (!!!) that title, but after all it's true. Finally we know WHY after more than 900 years of travelling a highly dangerous universe, the Doctor still keeps on going: for FUN. But apart from that I have to say "Waters of Mars" doesn't belong to my most favourite Doctor Who episodes. You could find it on a much higher position on my "Worst Doctor Who Episodes" list. And that's only RTD's fault, literally.

Ok, let's try to be more serious.

First there is to say, "Waters of Mars" wasn't scary. Today's children are used to Harry Potter and stuff, so "Waters of Mars" didn't give even me the creeps, and I'm not exactly the biggest Harry Potter fan existing. But those children are. The beeb should check what they so-called "target" audience is watching on a normal Sunday evening before declaring something as "scary".

Further, I really disliked the last 15 minutes of it. Yes, now we can surely do a much better character sketch of the Doctor's recent regeneration, but I can't help thinking "it just wasn't worth it".

Controversially, the first 20 - 25 minutes were great. It was quite amusing seeing the Doctor not knowing what to do, dashing between decisions like an electron being shortly before reaching the right energy level to leave an atom. But what RTD made of this was a worst-case scenario. My main problem is no-matter when or on which planet Adelaide would have died this certain "fix point in history" would have been changed anyway. Except the Doctor knew this before saving the whole crew. The effect shouldn't have taken him by surprise. So, what exactly was he hoping for?

However, another way of seeing this is that the Doctor knows he is going to die, no matter what, so maybe he wanted to change a certain point in time to open Gallifrey's "time-lock". As a result, the last thing he might do is trying to save "them", the Timelords, as on a personal level there is nothing he could lose anymore.

So, RTD's actual storyline, or rather what we know about it, is something like the Doctor changes a "fix point" in history and time and history are in flux for a short time while everything tries to re-arrange itself. Then Sigma-Ood turns up and the Doctor realises what he actually has done by being a bit "selfish" (if trying to save people (the crew) /or maybe a whole planet (Gallifrey) or both whilst knowing that in future one is going to die at the attempt of doing so, can be called selfish). Or does the Doctor at last realise that having "laws" for time wasn't such a bad idea? But RTD wouldn't be RTD if he didn't add an extra portion of adventure and drama to it. Furthermore he characterises our future fellows as rude folks who can't even utter a "thank you" after someone has saved their lives.

Anyway, all in all RTD managed to reach his goal: As WoM ended in a very awkward cliff-hanger so he can be sure about having top ratings no matter what the beeb decides to put "End of Time" against with.

And another interview.

Today I stumbled across this, it's a (more or less typical) David Tennant interview. There is really nothing to say about it. I know, I'm just about to hit my personal best mark in writing my shortest post ever. Good for you ;) Ok, and (I'm really trying hard to stay under the limit) if there is anyone out there being interested into what RTD has to say about the final and other stuff, there's a link on Combom's blog.

Cheers.

Comic Con Panel 2009

Maybe I'm not the only one who is searching for a good quality copy of the Comic Con Doctor Who panel luckily there are a few people who uploaded it to YouTube. This is the best version I've found. If the other parts should not be loading, just go to YouTube.

So, what did it tell us. Well, sometimes I wished the questioners had read trough a few old David Tennant, Russel T Davies, and Julie Gardner interviews.

One of the highlights is Julie Gardner doing a Doctor Who movie joke, although, personally I don't believe we'll get an actual movie. I know, it has already been on the big screen once, but does Doctor Who really support that kind of format? I don't think so... Still, rumours like that maybe don't come out of thin air. 

Then we have David Tennant giving, as always, the only right answers to some rather standard questions. Come on, the one about Fireflies and the legendary brown coat is an absolutely old one.

All in all, there weren't any news, just a few set - stories which might have been new to a few people. But apart from that, we do not really get anything which might come close to 'news'.

Another typical RTD interview

A few days ago I came across this interview with Russel T Davies. It's mostly about Doctor Who, he also mentions the specials, but, as usual, he doesn't give away anything we wouldn't already know about. Still, it's interesting. There are a few nice background information of RTD's era, although I think not everything is true... RTD claims he did always know that Chris Eccelston won't stay for another season, but I remember a few old interviews in which he said exactly the opposite. At least, it's nice to know that even RTD haven't "planned" each story arch in the show.
Here are a few remarkable abridgments, but I think the original article is worth to be given a read. About his finals (more or less) in general

I don't just increase things in scale because I'm mad. With "Doctor Who," every year the finale got bigger, and every year the rating got bigger. [...] Increasing the scale of the program has literally paid off. If the viewers had been deserting the show, I would have done something different. When we get to David Tennant's finale, you will not believe the scale of it. But it's all about the acting in the end.

About Donna Noble's noble "end" in s4 [interviewer, RTD]

I've only seen two of the specials so far, but there's this recurring theme about The Doctor not wanting to take on a new companion because of what happened in "Journey's End."

Poor Donna Noble.

You're a bastard, by the way.

Ha ha ha! He just called me a bastard. Ha ha ha ha!

About the upcoming specials

The bigger picture is why The Doctor's traveling alone -- because he's heartbroken, because he loses too much in the end (each time). This is an arc over these last few specials, gradually, especially in "Waters of Mars," which comes up in November, we discover that he travels with a human because he needs a human. He's too powerful, and without that (human with him), he can become a dangerous man. Donna pointed that out to him in her very first story, "The Runaway Bride." [...] We're sort of all heading towards series 5 and the new Doctor and the new companion, played by Karen Gillan. I think it's a nice set-up for her, in that The Doctor needs a companion and we're going to understand why.

About him bringing Doctor Who back on our screens

I worried that, if I'd fumbled it on this resurrection, it would have been fumbled for a few decades. And we got lucky in the timing, If we'd been five years later, we would never have been able to afford the program I wanted to make. I wanted it to be expensive. I'm not saying all good television is expensive, because I've worked on some of the cheapest shows in the world. But the ambition, and the big picture, and the epic intimacy demanded that. And then all of this was theory, and none of us knew if it would work, but we got on air, and it worked, and it's been wonderful.

About him NOT "planning" every story aches

Some things are planned. There was never a rigid plan that I followed for five years and never deviated. But the important thing is, I was thinking about "Doctor Who" more than I should have every day. Even the strongest fan of "Doctor Who" will think about "Doctor Who" a lot, then go on to their regular job, and I was thinking about "Doctor Who" all day, every day. [...] I know my own mind and it's always prodding the idea and finding ways to push it forward. If "plan" means having everything constantly in flux, then that is what we had.

And finally: him watching the show as a fan

I don't know if this is good or bad, but I've always been able to sit and watch my own stuff and enjoy it. Sometimes, I'll sit down and I'll just catch an episode by chance. I caught the Shakespeare episode ("The Shakespeare Code") by chance the other night and I thought it was magnificent. I really, really can watch it as a viewer. I always cultivated that in my head, you have to train yourself to watch it as brand-new, so you can see its faults and its strengths, so I've always been good at it. So I can watch it on repeats. I still love them. And thankfully, I love watching the old show as much as I did. I can still watch the old classics from the 70s and be as happy as I was when I was a kid.

Yes, but not if we're going into a nightmare.

Two weeks ago, we were all glued to our idiot's lanterns and watched "Planet of the Dead" [PotD]. Ok, that's an exaggeration, as there were more people watching "Britain got Talent" than Doctor Who... but who cares. I bet those who stumbles across this blog belongs to the "PotD" minority. 

So, what was this eagerly awaited episode all about. Firstly, I need to say it was one of Russel T Davies' [RTD] best episode we've ever had. Only "The Runaway Bride" has been better in my opinion. But maybe that's only me, because I'm a Donna fan, and because I like having a "real" villain on the screen. But I'm glad the PotD's "swarm" wasn't put down as "simply bad".

I know Lawrence Miles' famous "PotD" review. I wished he wouldn't delete his posts constantly, although this time he sailed really close the wind. If it were still available I would have posted a link. But it's not. Not yet. He's going to write a new one, although I always like the first version more, it's more spontaneous.

So, here is my first objection. I'm sorry, but the Tritovores were.... pointless. They didn't look great or interesting, or is it that they just don't fit? Don't get me wrong. I liked them in a very non terrestrial way, but "Planet of the Dead" is the wrong episode to appear in for them. I wonder if the producers of "The Fly" will take the BBC for copyright infringements to court. 

Talking about pointlessness. Are humans really like those passengers behaved? I don't think so. Maybe I'm living in an area with really extraordinary people, but just have a look at your accompanion on the public transportsysthem in the morning... what do you see? Are we really this shallow? 

I have to admit there have been also a few positive aspects about "PotD", elsewise I haven't written that it was RTD's second best episode. I loved Edward' Lee performance. Malcolm was a great character, a typical genius. Chaotic, loyal and just with the right portion of craziness. I hope this hasn't been the last time Malcolm appeared on our screens. 

>So, what about the others. There isn't a lot to say about David Tennant that hasn't already been said many times by many others. We already know he's magnificent and we'll still going to miss him. After waiting three month for the next episode I almost got used to the idea him stepping out of the TARDIS. But now I still can't believe it. Then: Michelle Ryan did a great job. Cathrina de Souza was an amazing character, and she and the Doctor were an incredible good team. She was one of the few sensible characers with whom the Doctor worked with, although she wanted to follow him after all. Her answer to the Doctor's "Allons-y" - "Oui, mais pas si nous allons vers un cauchemar. [Yes, but not if we're going into a nightmare.] should be hanging in a frame on the wall of the TARDIS, reminding the Doctor's companions of what's so obvious. But this nightmares are exactly the reason why we love this show. 

The next nightmare "The Waters of Mars" (The Wars of the Master/ or Hamster Software) looks really angsty. We've had an amazing cliff hanger, and I bet, Russel T Davies will spoil the last episode by writing a final a la Russel T Davies: with pointless dialogues, with an unrealistic storyline, and yes, I do know that Doctor Who is a science - fiction show, so nothing is really impossible, but I'm just asking the main writer to concentrate a little bit more on the word "science" than on "fiction". Thank you very much. 

I hope he won't bring Rose back, but again, it's RTD we are talking about. I don't feel like wanting another "Journey's End" fiasco. And that's exactly what RTD's finales usually are.

RTD's desirable Utopia

Only three very effective words: I'm shocked! If you haven't heard the recent news, just have a look at this.

I know we're facing an economic crisis and that because of this development the government spends less money on culture, just the same way every one else do. But I think they are wrong when they don't fund children's television anymore. RTD says:

"They're our children, they're the most vital and precious resource you could ever find. It is more important than industry, it is more important than the economy, it is more important than food and education."

Maybe he isn't the most innovative script writer (I'm sorry, that's my honest opinion), but if there's one thing he's really adapted in, then it's children's television. You don't need to be an expert to be able to say "he knows his job". Because of him "Doctor Who" became the show we know and love today. Before him it was something for "real" sci-fi fans, or it was considered as "children's stuff" (although I really love the old episodes as well). But he made it popular. And it's his "fault" that today millions of fans can't wait until Easter because of the next special.

And I also do know, the article isn't about Doctor Who but other programs (e.g. Sarah Jane's Adventures) although they don't want to raise too much money for the special effects anymore, but it's just the same. Right, they won't cancel one of their most successful programs. 

But we're living in the 21st century, and I really hoped we'll do a better job than 80 years ago... Cutting culture to a minimum has never been an effective way of facing and fighting, or rather defeating an economic crisis. We shouldn't only notice the economical potential of the entertainment industry, but that it can motivate people to achieve their goals, even defeating a crisis. And taking the money away from our children is certainly a step into the wrong direction, especially as parents don't seem to have too much time for them (thanks to the economic crisis), so our children deserve at least some kind of quality entertainment. No, I'm exaggerating. 

What I'm trying to say is: entertainment is an important part of every child's life. And if the government doesn't care about a child's spare time (as no matter how engaged one's parents are, there are always a few "spare" hours left), then others will do. And I think the government should rather invest some money into children's television now, than into drug-rehab-clinics in the future.