Tuesday 12 November 2013

The Doctors Talk 'Who'

Den Of Geek published an interview with David Tennant and Matt Smith. Am I the only one who'd like to get John Hurt's opinion too? But anyway.

The interview is about the usual things.

How their Doctors get along with each other in the script:
DT: I think the fun is in the gap between the two. We've been finding joy in recognising the same thing, or having the same thought...
MS: ... or having a completely opposite thought. You know, why are you reacting like that...?
And we get reassured that the anniversary special is quite story-driven. It's always a good thing when the story stays in the focus of an episode. And if Moffat hadn't been telling us zingillion times that his main aim was to write a great story for the special, then I would have been a lot more worried about 'The Day of the Doctor's plot. But it's good to get reassured.
[...] actually what Steven has come up with is a way of moving the story on, and changing, changing the Doctor's very journey. And that's in a way not quite what you might expect. It could just be a celebration, but it's a lot more than that.
And they also talk about the different things each companion (Rose and Clara) bring to the show, how it was for David Tennant to come back, if there is some sort of TARDIS etiquette (nice idea) and Matt Smith's plans for the future.

Monday 11 November 2013

'The Star Is The Show.'

The Guardian is using an interview it made with Jenna Coleman as an introduction to Doctor Who. Or are they just trying to give a summary of the past events? 

Maybe the most humorous part  is them stating that the announcement of Peter Capaldi
"shared a hysteria in common with the announcement of a new pope, ended in August when Peter Capaldi was unveiled on primetime television as the new pontiff – sorry, 12th Doctor."
But the actual interview is rather lovely. The most quoted bit has to be 
"I just read the script the other night. I'd been putting it off for ages and ages, because once you read the last page, that's it, the story is over. So I read 10 pages on the tube and I stopped, and then I picked it up again the other day and finished it. I was an absolute mess, an absolute wreck. But it's good; it's sad, but it's what needs to happen. It's perfect."
 And Jenna Coleman also mentions a few things about her past, how she ended up acting and being cast for Who, her personal experiences Who's frantic fandom, and what other things she is involved with ATM. 

Saturday 9 November 2013

The Extended Trailer

This one is almost twice as  long as the one from this morining, and also a bit more spoilery. But in a good way. 



One thing which came to my mind while watching the trailer is that Moffat said that he wants the special to "be the first step on the next journey. So looking at the trailer in this way, what if Moffat is bringing back Gallifrey. The idea would fit. After all, John Hurt's Doctor seems to be the one who destroys, sorry, time-locks it, and it takes two other Doctors to stop him, because they have figured out another way of ending the Time War, one which does not require the end of Gallifrey... At the same time I hope I'm wrong. Because it would make the story of the 1oth Doctor a bit dodgy, given the fact that one of the last things he does is to make sure that Gallifrey stays timelocked. And if we change this, then the Time Lords do not need the Master to bring their home planet back into exitance,  i.e. the Master does not conquer the earth, the whole radiation stuff never happens, because of what Wilf does not go into the chamber and does not end up knocking 4 times... Unless the Mighty Moff has another far less logical, timey-wimey solution for the plot. Let's wait and see.

The Leaked 'The Day of the Doctor' Trailer

What does not leak these days? Well, I'm far from complaining, because this way the trailer, which was supposed to air this evening, or maybe on Sunday, could not be stopped to make its way to the internet several hours earlier than the actual air date would have originally suggested. It's either that the lovely Beeb has screwed up a few things again, or someone with a TARDIS travelled to the future and did not mind to cause a tiny paradox...

So, ladies and gentlemen, here is the eagerly awaited masterpiece. And it's a good one.

Friday 8 November 2013

The First 'The Day of the Doctor' Clip

Seriously, if you want to enjoy the 5oth aniversary without being spoiled in advance, you may not want to read this post and/or watch the video. Then again, it's not exactly giving away the special's synopsis, but deals with mere speculations. 

Back to the eagerly awaited news. While, as requested, the #SaveTheDay hashtag has been trending the Beeb released a 14 second clip of 'The Day of the Doctor' featuring an, according to Clara, impossible painting.



So, the question is, why does Clara think that painting is impossible? To bring some light into this matter, here is a screencap of the aformentioned picture. What can we see?

Not much at first glance... That's the least pixel-y image I could find, and as I was not happy I decided to  refocus, resharpen and recontrast the original a bit and this is the result:

I know, not CSI worthy, but still better than the first one.
Is it just me, or does the burning tower look a lot like the Citadel of the Time Lords back in good old Gallifrey. And the reason for Clara recognising it is that because she has been basically part of the Doctor's timeline, she of course has to know how the most prestigious building of the Doctor's home planet looks like. 

The more intriguing question is, why is it burning? Has it something to do with the Time War? And why should Queen Elizabeth I be linked to it? She may know about it because she used to be a love-interest of the Doctor. But why paint a picture about the Time War?

Thursday 7 November 2013

'The Day of the Doctor' Marketing Campaign Is On

Once a wise man said it never rains, but pours. So the official Doctor Who marketing campaign of the BBC has started yesterday evening and we still can't see the end of it. 

It all started when yesterday the guys responsible for the BBC Wales twitter account tweeted:


 I.e. we'll get  a 'The Day of the Doctor' trailer this weekend. After the Comic-Con trailer disappointment this summer (they got an exclusive trailer, in fact so exclusive that it didn't even made it to the internet) this is more than just.

Additionally, there are some rather interesting interviews with the Fab Four of Who and Joenna Page. And if you prefer watching rather than reading them (because it's worth it) you can do so, by clicking on the names.

We have Steven Moffat talking about writing 'The Day of the Doctor', the reason for bringing the Zygons back, John Hurt's Doctor, and how it was to have two, well, actually 3 Doctors on set at the same time. And last but not least, how and where he's planning to spend November 23rd.

Matt Smith, David Tennant and Jenna Coleman chat about  the great time they had filming the special, the chemistry on and off set,  and how it was like to film in 3D.

And then there is Joenna Page *mild spoiler alert, seriously* who is Queen Elizabeth I in this year's special, just in case you didn't know. Actually, the whole interview should come with a 'mild spoiler alert' sign. But once you know that Queen Elizabeth I is part of the story, it's not difficult to come  up with what some part of the special will have to be about. After all, Elizabeth I has some sort of a reputation in the Whoniverse. Her describing the actually freezing picnic scene made me giggle. Because that's yet another thing Who is quite famous for and they seem to have been eager to keep up the tradition.

And last but not least, this is a friendly reminder that the BBC is asking us with this video to get #SaveTheDay trending on twitter. I think a note on Who's official site would have done it all the same...

UPDATE: And yet another Strax's field report. This time about the Zygons. Is it just me or am I getting too old for this?

Wednesday 6 November 2013

The Escape Artist - Playing Football

Now we are getting somewhere. 

I'm sorry for my last week's review not being an awfully nice one. However, I wouldn't change a single world of it. Because all of it is true. I still think last week's episode was too much action/too many introductions to in-jokes and hints. And too little time to appreciate them. At the same time I'm pretty aware of that at least some of that stuff had to be there in part 1 in order to lie the grounds of making part 2 the well, not exactly masterpiece, but it still manages to be better than some of the other stuff presented right now on TV. And yet episode 1 saw too many hints hinting at too few actual surprises.

Nevertheless, this week we got the time to catch our breath between takes. Unlike last week we remembered that watching TV does not need to feel like running a marathon. 

We also got all the tiny references which were laid there to pick up last week. And this time we did not know their meaning but felt it too. A bit.

Like Will freaking out about Danny not coming home straight after school. And the fact that his son finds himself sitting next to his mum's murderer on the bus is not really helping teenagers to win an argument  about personal freedom... only in real life.

Wolstencroft also makes sure to tick off the 'add some emotion' box. Somehow, the moment when Will is repeatedly calling his wife's number only to listen to her voice on the answerphone was the most touching moment of the series so far.

And luckily, Maggie did not repeat Will's mistake of refusing Mr Foyle's handshake. 

We also got that green apple reference, and oh my dear, is Foyle having an affair with his witness? His attachment to her seems to get stuck on a professional basis, though. 

Then there were those hilarious scenes  at that Japanese restaurant in the mall, them talking about "football". Loved the illusions. Besides it seems that Will and his lawyer friends are going to get  some trouble because of that blond woman - what's her name. Talking about names... or rather about the loss of them. It seems I'm not the only one who is struggling with the names Wolstencroft has chosen for his characters. It's just a 3 episode series... not likely to get another season.  This means even the folks writing for the Guardian do feel OK referring to the characters using the actors' names. Admittedly, it's tempting.

And finally,  Wolstencroft also gives us a cliffhanger. Some sort of. After all, when you're exposed to the stuff written by the Mighty Moff your definition of  'a cliffhanger' dramatically changes. Well, not only that, I guess. But that's something for another post. 
So, given the fact that this episode is not written by the mastermind when it comes to frustrating cliffhangers, I guess Maggie doing what Will Burton did in episode number 1, and Foyle having not awfully terrible chances of getting away with it yet another time ATM, is as close to a cliffhanger in this series as things can get. 

Interestingly, the strange thing is, and I'm not sure if Wolstencroft has been aiming to achieving this effect, that one can easily imagine something like this happening in a real court. And by this I don't mean the still highly surrealistic situation of the actual case, but that in the end the one having the better lawyer/defender wins.

Tuesday 5 November 2013

'The Escape Artist'

Just a short note. If you happen to be searching for 'The Escape Artist' online this is the page you may be looking for. And yes, I hope I'll be able to provide a link for 'The Day of the Doctor' similarly fast.

According to the twitters, it's good. Enjoy.

UPDATE: And the link-collection for part 2.

The BBC Teasing Sherlock

After ages of waiting, thanks to the BBC  the Sherlockians have some new material to analyse and to speculate about.

Yes, it's just a screencap, so this wouldn't cause a too big stir in any other fandom. But it's been almost 21 months since the last episode, and we haven't been getting exactly a lot of news regarding season 3 ever since. So imagine if this would happen to your most favourite TV show, then you may start to grasp the gravity of the situation.

So, what does the picture tells us? Not much . Only that I'm hilariously happy to see John without his moustache and where did Sherlock put his scarf?

And just in case you've been wondering, there is still no sign of an air date. Not yet.

Tom Baker and Peter Davison on 'Who's Past

One of the most significant signs of Who's 5oth anniversary being not too far away anymore is that the papers have started conducting interviews with some of the actors who left their mark on this show.

This is The Guardian featuring Tom Baker commenting on his time on Who. Leaving those fan-ish debates on 'who is the best Doctor' aside, to many people Doctor Who would not be the same show if at one point in time Tom Baker didn't have played the mad man in the blue box. Just in case you don't believe me, take a look at the final of DoctorWhoTV's recent poll on the most popular Doctor and decide for yourself. A hint, it's not Matt Smith vs David Tennant.

And if you've ever been interested into Peter Davison's take on the show, on its past and its future,  then make sure not to miss this interview by the Telegraph. Maybe the most interesting question he gets asked is his opinion on a female Doctor:
It’s not as if genders are interchangeable on Gallifrey [...] I don’t like the idea of the Doctor having a sex change - it’s not as if you would have a female James Bond.
And I know a rather big number of Whovians who'd wholeheartedly agree. 

The only thing about which I have to disagree with him is that I don't think Rose was the first companion which the writers got right. Sarah Jane Smith has always felt like a proper companion to me. In a way, she felt much rounder than Rose, because Rose hardly ever seemed to doubt the Doctor's decisions.

Monday 4 November 2013

The Cost of Living in This Brave New World

And yet another, long overdue post dealing with the real world. Blame the world for being this busy and the BBC for being not. 

If by now you the name Edward Snowden does not ring a bell for you then you are either my spell-checker, or you have been living on a different planet for the past 5 months. After all, the coverage it got on the news has been overwhelming, to say the least. 

And while those nice people on the news tried their best to say what happened, somehow they didn't manage to inform the even nicer citizens of the world what Snoweden's revelations mean to us. 

Luckily, one of the recent articles in The Guardian makes a great job in provide answers in this matter. It's a rather longish one, but I have seldom seen a this easily comprehensive summary of how the publication of those top secret documents affects us. Give it a try.

So, what does it tell us? Mostly, that the world's secret services are an enormous and powerful organisation, and as such, you really do not want to mess with them. Because if there's stuff they do not know about, they'll soon have the technology to change this.

The only thing regarding the Sonowden documents which hasn't failed to take me by surprise is the fuss it stirred. Because, we do not really need those documents to learn that people, and therefore anything operated by people, lie. And most of us have suspected even before anno Snoweden that every step you make on the internet can be reconstructed, somehow; that for us mere mortals there is no such thing as a bug-proof 'line'; that your mobile is basically a device developed by the government to check the position and activities of its citizens 24/7. Giving information to the government is the cost we pay for living in this brave, new, even though constantly monitored, world. So, tap the 'connect to Wi-Fi' button and be nice. You may be watched.

Friday 1 November 2013

Re-Watching 'The Reichenbach Fall'

Yes, there may be better days to re-watch an episode like that. 

Anyway. Here are some things which came to my mind while watching Thompson's masterpiece. 
  • You know you're a Sherlockian when you know that it wasn't 18 months since John's last appointment. Well, at least not in *real* time. The BBC was kind and did not make us waiting 18 months. Not quite.
  • Come on, there are TWO people all these people should be thanking for. Sherlock for solving the case, and John for keeping people from killing his rather annoying friend. 
  • Just in case you didn't know, that thing with the gum, the diamond and the fire-extinguisher doesn't work in real life. Sadly, up to my  knowledge they haven't featured this in Mythbusters yet. Feel free, to correct me if I'm wrong; not about the not working, but about the Mythbusters bit. Does anyone feel like giving them a call?
  • When the little girl starts screaming at Sherlock... It get's me. Every time.
  • How can Moriarty be sure that Sherlock won't share the cab with John this time?
  • Sherlock uses a Mac? Thompson, why are you doing this to me? It muse be Sherlock's as in season 1 John's laptop used IE to open a page. This couldn't have been possibly any worse.
  • Watching John's struggle in Kitty's flat when Moriarty makes him listening to his part of the fairytale is so painful.That moment John cannot help himself but to consider the odds. At the same time he hates himself for doubting his friend. That's why he is so upset. He hates that this man makes him doubt Sherlock's loyalty for a splitsecond. By the time he flickers through Kitty's scraps of *evidence* he has made up his mind of what's going on. And now he is only afraid that this time Sherlock may not escape this web Moriarty has created for him. Because he, John Watson, has no idea what Sherlock could do.
  • The fact that after the big showdown at Kitty's flat Sherlock decides to leave John on his own without giving a convincing explanation shows how much he trusts him.
  • The only thing Sherlock does out of character in 'The Reichenbach Fall' is him asking Molly for help. Taking Moffat's level of trolling into account and the fact that it's so obvious, it may not be wrong to assume that that is what he referred to as the clue to how Sherlock survived the fall. Oh, and it being so obvious is the reason why everyone is 'missing' it. We are rather speculating about rubber balls (possible) and Rhododendron Ponticum (wrong, come on, just look at the other side effects) than accepting the obvious: it was Molly and apart from that we don't know.
  • I'm sorry, but am I the only one bothered by Sherlock and Moriarty wearing their winter coats while the broad-leafed trees are standing beautifully green in the background? Not to mention the sun beaming from the sky? Hold on is this a clue?
  • And we present the only correct way to respond to someone saying 'you're insane': 'You're just getting that now?' Awwww, Moriarty. I'm going to miss you. 
  • After reading about Sherlock's suicide Mycroft takes the same thinking position as his brother used to do... they are brother's after all. And some part of him knows it's a fake.
  • Oh_my_dear1#: John's 'I'm actually not that angry' when Mrs Hudson is going on and on about Sherlock's bad habits, which he is all probably missing now really badly, made me smile.

Thursday 31 October 2013

'The Escape Artist' - A Broken World

I have to admit the idea behind the plot is quite intriguing: There is this fantastic defender who helps winning a suspected criminal, Liam Foyle, his hopeless case. And then, somehow the criminal ends up killing his defender's wife. This alone is a really challenging (not to say unrealistic) set-up and if this had been produced in the US I'm sure FOX or BBC America would have made sure to make a whole American season out of it, which equals 24 episodes. Instead of 3.
And to be honest, in this case I'm not sure if the Americans had been that wrong. After all, the first part of this trilogy feels rather rushed. It feels exactly like the introduction of a book. You get the setting, you understand the action. And my dear, there is a lot of action going on. So you know what things mean to them, but you aren't given the time to feel it too. The story does not get the time to sink in. It does not get the time to do its grim sparkle.

If this would have been an American production I guess by the time Will Burton loses his wife, in episode 5, they would have made sure we sit there blinking back tears. And as the credits roll in, our brains would slowly start to kick in thinking what can be the motivation behind a deed like this? How can a denied handshake have such consequence?  This way, we only do the thinking.
Then again, maybe the rushed feeling is just one part of the actual problem. Somehow, the story does not feel right. In addition to the obvious lack of closure, it's not exactly helping that its plot is highly unrealistic: First of all, why should have Foyle never used his own computer to access those adult sites? He was living on his own, well, if we don't count the birds. He paid for the content. Why not access it as well ? Additionally, why on earth should Foyle's sick mind come up with the idea of killing Burton's wife? That refused handshake cannot have been such a big incentive... Why should he accept to go to jail for it? What's more, why should Maggie defend Foyle? Yes, Maggie may be the second best out there, but still, she and Will know each other, what's more, she was talking to his wife. Isn't there a paragraph saying something about a personal conflict? Or does this only apply to American doctors, lawyers and investigators? But the cherry on the imaginary cake of surrealistic situations is that Will's wife decides to spend that night at the cottage... I know these days couples do not talk. But how could she miss something was going on... Besides Will certainly knew about his wife's plans for the weekend. So why not mention that lunatic he had to defend at court the other day?

So  actually, I do not know why the world Wolsstencroft created for his series does not feel right. Is it really broken or is this just what one may call the result of lazy plotting?
 
All in all, this was an puzzling introduction. It's a pity that it wasn't a puzzling story as well.

Tuesday 29 October 2013

Losing a Bit of Magic

You made me forget myself
I thought I was someone else.
Someone good.  - Lou Reed, Perfect Day
Usually, I'm writing about stuff which is somehow related to Doctor Who, Sherlock, or both. But I hope you don't mind if this post will be an exception. It deals with the real world for a change. It deals with the death of Lou Reed.

If you are anything like me, you may not have spent a lot of your time listening to his songs. At least, I'm honest enough to admit that I didn't, even though there are some pieces written by him I love more than I could put down in words, as well as many others which simply do  not speak to me. But my dear, those which speak have a great story to tell, and every time I'm so eager to listen.

I always thought it to be strange that a stranger, a guy who is several times my age, has a better idea of what love means to me and of what *my* personal 'Perfect Day' would look like than most of the boys I have dated.  That was the gift of Lou Reed. His words have manage to touch the heart of people he never knew, and never will. That's what he left behind, and that's why he is so dearly missed.

PS: I can't help including Neil Gaiman's Lou Reed tribute; excellently written and with just the right amount of heartbreak. So hop over to The Guardian. I promise, you won't regret reading.

Sunday 27 October 2013

Why Sherlock Is Better Than the Original

Yes, I know what people say about books. And usually, I'm on their side. Green's The Fault in Our Stars is better than the film will ever manage to be. Not to mention Tolkien's LotR triology. I was about 11 when I read the books. That's why the films are NOTHING like the moving pictures I saw in my head. 

However. There is one exception. Sherlock. I hope people are wrong and that there are actual people who are familiar with the originals, such as 'A Study in Scarlett' or 'The Hound of Baskevilles'. And even though I have to admit that his stories would make every screenwriter of NCIS jealous, there is still one thing which Doyle gets wrong.  It's the way he writes Watson. His Watson is flat. He doesn't make much. His only purpose is to see (not to observe!) and to write. 

I accept that there weren't many 'How to Write Good' manuals around in 1895. But one of the most basic things which even Doyle should have known about writing is that you really do not want to have any flat characters in your story. They just spoil the whole thing. You want proof?

Let's take 'A Study in Scarlett' vs 'A Study in Pink'. For me, without doubt, the BBC adaptation wins. Scarlet starts with Watson describing his situation in a rather fancy (read boring) manner.  Doyle could have cut the first  paragraphs down to a few sentences. After all, no one is reading Doyle's book because of Watson. And delivering what your readers are expecting to read is one of the most crucial facts about writing which  everyone picking up a pen to put a story down should keep in mind. Additionally, a big part of the story focuses on Holmes' clever deductions to show that he is an extraordinary guy. But most of it does not add much to the actual story.

Now. Pink has those showing-Sherlock-is-nuts parts as well. Actually, they are present in the most authentic manner I've ever seen, keeping as close to the original as possible. And yet. The story feels completely different. Why? It's because of John. This John makes up his own mind. He may have less accurate (or more realistic) deduction skills, but he is not afraid to stand up against Sherlock whenever he thinks his friend is wrong. He's not afraid of an argument. He means business. At the same time, unlike Watson, he does not take himself too important.

Because of this, Doyle's Watson ends up being the guy with whom Holmes shares a flat and he becomes his mere audience, while Sherlock and John are not just flat mates but friends. Holmes does not really rely on Watson. Anyone else could fill that position just fine. On the contrary, Sherlock needs John just as much as John needs Sherlock. Sure, for different reasons. While Sherlock manages to add some content to John's life, John becomes some sort of Sherlock's moral compass keeping him 'human'. Otherwise, Sherlock's customers may hire a serial killer on him before Sherlock could actually finish the case... And even though Sherlock dose not care about what people are thinking about him, John's friendship matters to him. And, what's more, their friendship becomes one of his obvious weaknesses. It's so obvious that Moriarty uses it against him. This is why the BBC's 'Reichenbach Fall' is more touching than the original. Here, Sherlock is not fighting a villain or for his reputation. He is willing to die as a fraud if it means to save John and to ease his friend's pain. I'm not sure if Doyle had been able to say the same about his Sherlock Holmes. 

Doyle's stories are about an extraordinary clever man solving extraordinary puzzles. Sherlock is about two extraordinary people having an extraordinary friendship. And when it comes to writing a good story, friendship always wins. Always.

Re-watching 'The Great Game'

And the re-watching continues. There weren't many unanswered questions this time.  And I can't believe I've managed to wait more than year a to find out what happened next. Clicking 'next episode' feels like heaven right now. Oh, those lucky things which will get into Sherlock after 'The Empty Hearse'. How much I envy them. There *really* should be a built in one-year-waiting button in the next DVD box-set.

So, enough chatting; here we go again. 
  • Why does Sherlock identify the handwriting on the envelope with the phone as that of a woman's? Who wrote it to him? Moriarty? Did he fake his own handwriting? Or does he just write like a girl? Hang on, is that an insult?
  • Who'd be stargazing from London? Well, I know about Greenwich but, still, wouldn't there be too much light pollution to enjoy the view?
  • Why does Sherlock *pretend* to do the shopping? John wouldn't have left faster...
  • Oh_my_dear#1 When Sherlock sees John at the pool he HAS to think for a second that he's Moriarty.
  • Oh_my_dear#2 What's worse. That's what has to come to John's mind too. But he cannot tell his friend because he has to repeat what Moriarty is saying to him.
  • Oh_my_dear#3 When Moriarty finally show up in person they have to think they won't make it out alive. Well, that's at least what's on John's mind. After all, now they know how he looks like. So why should he let them go. That's why John's willing to sacrifice his life. Well, that and the fact that he really likes Sherlock.
  • Oh_my_dear#4 Sherlock has no idea what to do with the gun after Moriarty has left.

Re-Watching 'The Blind Banker'

 Just some things which came to my mind when re-watching 'The Blind Banker'.

  • What happened to the man Sherlock was fighting while John was out shopping? Why is that guy Sherlock's message for the people of the Jaria Diamond case? Why shouldn't John know about this?
  • Why does Sherlock not let John in the flat after he enters it via the balcony? Does he want to make sure it's safe? Or does he not want to be distracted by his friend?
  • What did Sherlock need that pen he'd been waiting for 'about an hour'? Good, him catching it without looking is quite impressive. I give you that. But you could have made him actually do something with it.
  • Why does John use Internet Explorer? WHY?
  • What is Sherlock's motivation behind him not telling John about that guy in Soo Lian Yao's flat? Is he that vain? Or is there more behind it?
  • Couldn't help noticing that John's phone has great picture taking abilities illuminating the whole chiphre on the wall. In 2o1o. And it's an old phone he got from Harry... 
  • The most unrealistic part of the episode is that Van Coon has so many books. Have you met people making a great living working at banks? More importantly, have you met their bookshelves?
  • The guy at the ticket selling boot at the circus has to notice that John is not Sherlock. When Sherlock turns up he introduces himself to John's date right in front of the ticket seller's eyes.
  • Love the way John says 'this is... art', as if art were something disgusting.  
  • And most importantly, why didn't Van Coon ask his secretary to give him the hair pin back? Why was he willing to die for it?

Friday 25 October 2013

We Have a Date

No, not that kind of date, but one for Sherlock's eagerly awaited 3rd season. Well, sort of.

Because actually, it's not us who have a date, but our dear fellows on the other side of the big pond, who are going to find out how Sherlock survived his fall on 
You may want to save it. 

However, maybe not, because in the brave new world of copyright infringements and streaming sites you do not need to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce that BBC One may want to broadcast season 3 a bit earlier than that, i.e. even if you happen to live on the North pole, you could watch season 3 only a few hours after the lucky guys in the UK.

So, the big question regarding the British air date still remains. One thing for sure, this time PBS Masterpiece won't make the mistake of letting fans wait 4 additional months. Just in case you didn't know, while the  Britons could enjoy season 2 already on January 1 2o12, PBS Masterpiece only broadcast it on May 6. Unsurprisingly, the fact that you could watch "A Scandal In Belgravia" in Russia only one day after the British air date caused a bit of a scandal in its own right.

But back to the British air date. Taking the fact into account that the BBC's 'the two of us against the rest of the world'-trailer is actually entitled 'Original British Drama 2013' there's hope season 3 airs this year.

Friday 18 October 2013

Re-watching 'A Study in Pink'

Statistically speaking, Sherlock may be the most watched TV series on earth. Seriously. Just start to imagine how often you can finish watching all Sherlock seasons in one year. And it's been three since 'A Study in Pink'. 

Watching an episode again and again and again has side effects. And I'm not only referring to the irresponsible amount of Sherlock references on tumblr or pinterest, by which one may assume that Sherlock does not have only 6 episodes by know, but six seasons. At least. But, I'm rather trying to hint at the many many details to which you start paying attention when watching an episode a second time. And frankly, most Sherlockians have seen the complete series a bit more than that. In fact, most may say they've lost count.

So, to cut a short story even shorter, here is a list of a few things which struck me as odd when re-watching Moffat's masteripeice 'A Study in Pink'.
  • Why did the bottles of the other victims contain more than one pill?
     
  • Sherlock and Watson leave 221b Bakerstreet at daylight to visit the crime scene. And all of a sudden it turns dark. Sure, it's winter, but how far can Brixton Lauriston Gardens be? I know, according to Google Maps, about 30 minutes... My point is, however, still standing.
     
  • Why should Anderson be wearing a different deo when Sally is the one who did not make it home last night?
     
  • Why is the pink lady's umbrella white when she has a pink suitcase. Come on. It's more difficult to get a pink suitcase than a pink umbrella. Have you never been shopping?
     
  • I love the fact that Anderson (well, Jonathan Aris) can pronounce the German word 'Rache' correctly.
     
  • And, I also love that Sherlock, the big genius, follows anyone's first instinct, and 'decides' not to trust the cabbie when taking the bottle the cabbie apparently wanted to take himself, i.e. the one he did not offer to Sherlock. According to Sherlock it was not a double bluff. Just a bluff.  It's either that or he is the one having trust issues and not John. Then again, anyone would find it difficult to trust a murderer. 

Friday 11 October 2013

Did Sherlock Choose the Right Bottle?

Frankly, since watching 'A Study in Pink' that question has been on many people's minds. So did he?

Let's look at the facts.

The big difference between the cabbie and his 'playmate' is that the cabbie and his playmate have utterly different motives. The cabbie's passenger wants to prove their wits. They want to show off; pretty much what Sherlock is trying to do all the time. The cabbie on the other hand does not mind what other people are thinking about him. His motive is money. He has a sponsor and he wants to earn as much as possible by playing along.

Another point which should not be ignored is that the cabbie knows which is the good bottle. And the playmate knows the cabbie knows... And the cabbie knows the playmate knows that he knows... You get the idea.

Furthermore, the cabbie states that he's secret is that he's able to read people's minds. But is that enough? After all, people are changing their minds all the time, especially when they are about to make such a life threatening decision. There are simply too many variables the cabbie cannot account for. Even if the victim's first idea was to take the other bottle, out of instinct, and then, as the reasonable part of their mind is kicking in, to change their decision and to take the one handed by the cabbie. Then they change their minds again, thinking that maybe that's what the cabbie wanted them to do all along, and so on. Reading the other's mind is not helping in this game as before the cabbie tosses the good/bad bottle his victim has not made up their mind completely. This means, the cabbie does not know which bottle to draw his victim's attention to before doing so.

Yet, he has played the game 4 times and the odds seems to have been irresponsibly in his favour. And  here he is, trying his luck for a 5th time. What's more, he seems to be sure that he'll win again, even when facing the most clever man walking the surface of the earth. If he had had doubts, he could have switched off the phone and chosen another passenger instead. And even after making Sherlock choosing a bottle, he does not seem to lose his faith in beating him. His behaviour does not change. Picking up the other bottle from the table, all he says is 'interesting' as if he wasn't talking about his own life. So the cabbie is either too stupid for his own good, something he does not really seem to be, or he's not playing a fair game.

Because the only way to ensure that his victims will always pick the wrong bottle, is by offering them two wrong bottles. The obvious downside of this theory is that the cabbie ends up with one bad bottle as well. But playing a crooked game, he knows the pills. He knows what makes them poisonous. And he could take an antidote before the game is on. By this he makes sure that he cannot be beaten by his opponents. Besides, it makes him sure to be able to outwit Sherlock. He knows Sherlock will be  fascinated by the nature of the game, that it will be tempting him and that he will not consider the intellectual challenge to be a fraud. Showing that he's clever is such a holy action to Sherlock that playing a crooked game does not cross his mind.

Thursday 10 October 2013

How to Do (or Not to Do) Re-makes


Remakes are a mixed box. Naturally, there's always the risk of creating something worse than the original. At the same time, they offer the chance to add a different perspective which can be awesome.

So, when Fox announced to remake Boradchuch  I was curious of what they'd turn it into. A 23 episodes/season long TV series (something the BBC/ITV cannot even start to imagine)? A zombie apocalypse wild western style in which neighbours are threatening each other with guns? A media-company thriller? More guns? Let's involve the government by making Danny's dad being an important member of the Republican party. Have I mentioned guns? It's a cliche, but the biggest difference between an American and a British crime-series is that the American series always feature an irresponsible amount of guns.

I simply wanted to see Fox taking the story's basic (actually already very American) set-up and turning it into something different. After all,  it's the differences which make a good remake live. 

However, when it became obvious that Chibnall is part of Fox's production team, and what's more, he's writing scripts, my excitement started to fade. Sure, he promises to make things different:
I’m very, very fascinated to see this story in a different landscape with an acting ensemble that’s just as strong but taken from really great American actors. The DNA of the original is absolutely intact and filtered through a new prism, so it should still feel just as vibrant, and interesting, and strange, and unique, and beautiful, but just in a different setting — and then it’s exploring the dramatic opportunities that that offers up. We’re not gonna do the terrible version. We’re gonna do a great version.
But getting him on the team makes the 'out of the box' thinking process a lot more difficult. It's like involving Doyle into BBC's recent adaptation of Sherlock. As Moffat mentioned in an interview, Doyle would probably hate what he and Gatiss have made of his stories. But this does not stop Sherlock from being an immense success.

And some days later, just as if the world would have wanted to prove my point, EW announces that Fox got David Tennant to play the lead. So much for Chibnall's 'great American actors' comment from the quote above. We know the British are great, but it's as if someone over there wasn't understanding the basic idea behind remakes. One clue: getting the same actor doing a different accent is not exactly the way the big successful remakes have started. Well, then again, there's always a first time for everything.

Wednesday 9 October 2013

The Show Must Go On

Ever since Peter Capaldi has been announced to be the 12th Doctor (and Hurt's non-Doctor assumedly increasing the number of used regenerations by one) the question of how Moffat (or the then showrunner in charge) is going to avoid the 12 regenerations rule has been on fans' minds.  After all, nobody expects the show to drop dead when Peter Capaldi will decide to bid his farewells.

And while it's not difficult to come up with an explanation of why the Doctor could have more than 12 regenerations, it's difficult to find an option without changing the show itself. 

Because the problem with saying that the Time Lords were in charge of the 12 regenerations rule and with them gone, the Doctor can have as many regenerations as he pleases is not that it's terribly unoriginal (at least for the Mighty Moff's standards) - well, that too - but that it would grant the Doctor immortality, at least in the right circumstances. And when dying stops having consequences (important consequences, I'm not saying that getting a new *body* is not a consequence, but there may be more important ones, erm, like ending a life) then dangerous situations stop being dangerous. Life is the most valuable thing someone can have. And as soon as it stops being at stake people simply tend to care a lot less than before.
Unfortunately, even Neil Gaiman's idea is failing to address the problematical immortal part of this issue:
MY OPINION (which is not Canon) is that the regeneration limit is a lot like the speed limit. You can break it, but things get a lot more dangerous if you do. The Time Lords were the traffic cops: they enforced the limit. With them gone, the Doctor can keep regenerating beyond 13, but with consequences.
On the plus side, he suggests that regenerating more than 12 times should have 'consequences' but apparently in his opinion dying should not be one of them. And that's not a good point to be at as a writer.

Let's not forget that we already had an immortal character, the famous Captain Jack Harkness. Plot-wise I do not think it did him any good. And that Torchwood isn't running anymore just emphasises the point.

One of the most important things from which Moffat's episodes derive their suspense is that the Doctor can die. Not only in an 'oh River*, put that gun down'-way, but that he can run out of regenerations. He is not immortal. Dying matters to him. Not only because it makes him change, but also because every regeneration brings him one step closer to his maximal 'life expectancy'. Unlike Superman, or Spiderman he has one. Unfortunately, the moment the Doctor stops having a life-expectancy the biggest difference between him and Marvel's superheroes stops to exist. And I'm not sure if we'd like to see the Doctor being turned into a superhero.
____
* or taking the 11th Doctor into account that may read *oh Doctor* instead

Tuesday 1 October 2013

Moffat on Continuty Fixes, Scarfs and Shoelaces



Ladies and Gentlemen, this is the Nerdcubed team interviewing the Mighty Moff.

And actually, as nerds go, the big, important questions which have been nagging Who's fanbase do not get asked, because it's a well known fact that Moffat would not answer them. So, why waste time and ask him in the first place.

But there is some new information we get. The Moff promies that the Peter-Capaldi-in-'The Fires of Pompeii'-thing will be addressed in the future...

He also says why the Doctor seems to have a certain fondness for humans and Earth: we look like his people and additionally, he points out that we do not see those stories in which he interacts with 'jellymonsters on jellyplanet' which are, 'frankly just too boring to watch'. And yes, those are actual quotes.
One of the most shocking things (as far as I'm concerned) is that Steven Moffat considers the TARDIS to be a machine which closely resembles a living creature, while the series actually makes us suggesting the opposite (a living thing which resembles a machine): after all, the Doctor states several times that the TARDIS cannot be built and that at least parts of it are grown, and  biologically, it's only living things which grow.  At the same time, Moffat says that he sees the TARDIS as a party animal who thinks about the Doctor as her pet.

The Moff does not approve of the popular regeneration theory, saying that the Doctor gets close to immune to whatever has induced the regeneration process. He mentions that in 'The End of Time' was not the first time the Doctor had to regenerate due to a radiation overdose.

Then we have some comments on the role of the Silence when it comes to Who's several continuity fixes, why Doctor Who and the show's ratings are not going down, and that Moffat is not planning to leave a mark on the UK's other cultural landmarks.

Saturday 28 September 2013

'Who' Minisodes

One of the reasons why Whovians are so keen on the Beeb releasing the Who DVD boxsets is that to shorten the ridiculously long waits between seasons (and episodes; season 8 won't start till autumn 2o14, just saying) they generally feature minisodes. And also this year Moffat and his team have not disappointed us. So, dear fellow Whovians, here they are. This year's 3 minisodes. Please, press the play button and enjoy.







The quality is a mess, and this year they are a bit silly, less spectacular and informative. But having them is still better than having nothing to watch till 'The Day of the Doctor'.

Friday 27 September 2013

Chibnall on Broadchurch

Even though Chris Chibnall seems to have taken lessons from the Mighty Moff on how to keep informations to himself, EntertainmentWeekly has still managed to talk a bit about Broadchurch with him. Of course, if your only motivation to read that rather longish interview is to find some hints dealing with season 2, then save your time and don't read it. The only paragraph in which it gets mentioned reads: 
Literally, as I stand here talking to you now, I am standing one foot away — I’ve now moved, just for the theater of it — in front of the board which has the whole of the first episode plotted out on it. Every single bit of the first episode, I’m looking at now… And that’s all I’m gonna tell you. [...] We know what we’re doing. And I’m really excited about it. For people who are wondering, I promise we have interesting stories still to tell.
The biggest part of the interview features some fascinating production stories, explaining the idea behind certain scenes and why he wanted to do and to shoot some of them in a certain way.

The only point which some may think of as news is that Chibnall is going to be pretty much involved into the American remake.
I’ve written the first episode and I’ll be an executive producer on it. There’s a whole team coming into place on that, and Fox will decide whether they go forward with it. [...] I think there’s a really great opportunity to make something that is hopefully as good if not better than the British version. I’m very, very fascinated to see this story in a different landscape with an acting ensemble that’s just as strong but taken from really great American actors. The DNA of the original is absolutely intact and filtered through a new prism, so it should still feel just as vibrant, and interesting, and strange, and unique, and beautiful, but just in a different setting — and then it’s exploring the dramatic opportunities that that offers up. We’re not gonna do the terrible version. We’re gonna do a great version.

Tuesday 3 September 2013

Just the Two of Us Against the Rest of the World



I know, it's not only about Sherlock. But after waiting a ridiculous number of months for season 3 you certainly understand why the Beeb's latest trailer makes them the happiest fandom in the world right now. It means new footage. Now, let's wait and see what they'll make of those 2o seconds.

Friday 23 August 2013

Moffat on the Past and the Future

With  'WorldScreen' getting the Mighty Moff to talk Who the interview-frenzy continues and they are contributing some rather interesting reading material.  Here are some snippets. 

On Moffat's first year as Who's headwriter:
I remember thinking, if these two things screw up, I’m finished! [...] This could be a really terrible year. I could crash Doctor Who and screw up Sherlock Holmes and if I’d just shot Daniel Craig in the face I’d have ended all of British culture. But it didn't work out that way.
On what Mattt Smith has brought to the role:
The last thing anybody thought when we cast the 26-year-old was that what we’d get is a return to the eccentric old boffin that he is at heart, the hipster boffin.
 On casting the new Doctor:
At the end of the day the objective is to convince the nation that somehow, despite the apocalyptic change, it really is the same person.
There are also some Sherlock bits, like  how he and Mark Gatiss came up with the idea and how updating it felt like a natural process.

Then we get a comment on the changing nature of watching TV schedule-free:
Your bookcase doesn't tell you when you can read. Why should your television tell you when you can watch? We’re heading towards the world of the download, and that’s a good thing. It will favor quality, I believe.
And, last but not least, why he thinks Who to be the most perfect  TV show ever envented:
It is the show you can’t kill. [...] It is dependent on no individual. You give it your all for the years that you do it and when you leave it won’t even notice [...] Not only can you recast the Doctor, you can create a Doctor who is appropriate for the times. He can always be modern. He can always be new. It’s an ancient tradition and yet it’s a brand-new iteration of that tradition. So it feels old and new at the same time.

But go on, and read the whole stuff, even though some of the statements may appear familiar to you, especially when you've been following Comic Con. However, some of the background-information has been utterly new to me, and there's a chance it will be new to you too. 

Saturday 10 August 2013

Peter Capaldi's Letter to His Younger Self

Ladies and gentlemen, I proudly present Peter Capaldi letter to his younger self. Now, that he's about to have a time machine, he'll be even one of those few lucky ones who'll be able to deliver it...

It's a lovely piece of reading on how, as a kid, he wasn't exactly happy about being a geek
I wish I’d known that one day the geek would inherit the Earth. When I was 16, geeks hadn’t been invented, so being tall and skinny, into horror movies and sci-fi and unable to play football simply made me the go-to guy for the sociopaths.
He also reveals his thoughts on the 'neutral' language actors are required to speak, and that he'd tell his younger self to worry less, as it's a waste of time, and to embrace being different. Which is actually an advice which goes for all of us.

Friday 9 August 2013

Moffat on Why We Didn't Get a Female Doctor

Yesterday 'The Telegraph' was running an article in which they where citing Moffat describing why he did not choose an actress as the 12th Doctor: 
I didn’t feel enough people wanted it [...] Oddly enough, most people who said they were dead against it were women.
I for my part am glad that Peter Capaldi is not a Petra Capaldi, however, I can't help feeling a bit disappointed about Moffat not mentioning to have any other reasons than peer-pressure. I mean, the Doctor has been a guy for 1000 plus years. Why should I change that, or even want to change that? It has become part of his identity. Sure, some may think it to be fun and the audience could cope. But could he? Could the stories? Wouldn't that be the famous jump over the shark? 

Changing his gender is not necessary, not story-wise and even not gender-policy-wise. For isn't the basic idea of emancipation that there is no difference between men and women, both of them have theoretically the same abilities, the same potential? So why should it be better to make him a her?

I simply fail to come up with a compelling reason. Maybe one day someone will. But I hope, for the sake of the fans and the show, that it will be a good one.

Monday 5 August 2013

Moffat on His Choice

To many fans, especially those who weren't spoiled by the leaks, Moffat casting Peter Capaldi as the 12th Doctor came as a surprise. Well, I do not know about you and your friends but if someone would have made a poll among my circle of friends, their guess would have been a less experienced actor. 

However, it's certainly not only them, but all Whovians who are keen on the story behind Moffat's choice, and fortunately 'DigitalSpy' makes sure we get served. 

Maybe the most burning question coming to our mind is if Moffat's big plan was to go for an older actor as the Doctor all along. His answer:
I  think it's good that we've got a different age [...] after Matt showed us all how to be a 20s Doctor. I don't know what you would do after that, because he was so perfect. [...] So it makes life easier, I suppose, that Peter is different. But that wasn't the reason.
And, the most important question of all of them; how is the 12th Doctor going to be like? Moffat does not know yet. 

And what will he wear?
Clothes. Anything else would be just really shocking!

Saturday 3 August 2013

The New Tenant of the TARDIS

The die is cast and after a ridiculous life-event we know that Peter Capaldi is the 12th Doctor. As things are at the moment, with Hurt's 'Doctor' increasing the number of the Doctor's completed regenerations, he also may be the last, strictly speaking, canonical Doctor. After all, we're still waiting for the BBC's emergency protocols to become effective and the Mighty Moff coming up with a solution for the 'odd 12 regenerations rule', as RTD used to call it.

So who is the new guy? If his name does not ring a bell to you, then you're either not living in the UK and/or are not familiar with British TV history. I'm sorry if that sounds harsh, but Capaldi is a legend.

Which is, ironically, the only, really, the only downside I can see in casting him. For nobody will refer to the big Peter Capaldi as “the guy from Doctor Who”. 

Apart from that I'm surprisingly pleased with Moffat's decision, because his choice fulfils my only requirement: I wanted someone who's a fan of the show. And Capaldi is famous for being in love with Doctor Who.

He's also Scottish, which is amusing as now we're having a Scottish showrunner, we had a Scottish actress playing a Scottish companion and this is the 2nd Scottish actor playing the Doctor within... has it been 4 years? I'm not complaining. So the only remaining question is whether he'll be allowed to keep his accent. Would that be fair?

And he's in his mid-50ies. Actually, that's the second, even though rather small, reason why Moffat's choice is a bit surprising. At least, for a change, nobody is complaining about the new guy being too young. And Capaldi looks as if he'd start every day with jogging ten miles, so he'll be certainly able to keep up with all the required running. No worries about that.

But it's somewhat unexpected that Moffat decided against 'playing it safe'. I thought he'd bend to the public pressure and cast someone looking 25. Because, let's face it, some of those people who have been regularly  watching Doctor Who for a few years now have not spent their Saturday afternoon in front of the telly because of the TV show's awesome concept or Moffat's writing abilities. But those, mostly female, viewers wanted to see Matt Smith in a bowtie saving the universe, or whoever needed to be saved that weekend. There will be certainly people watching Doctor Who because of Capaldi. But it makes this decision nevertheless a risk. One worth taking, IMHO, because it serves the story. We like to forget that our favourite 1000plus years old Time Lord is not 25 any more. At the same time Capaldi has already proven to be an excellent actor so I have no doubts that we won't be missing the Doctor's, let's call it bouncy qualities in season 8.

The last remaining question to tackle is his costume. Will the 12th Doctor still think bow ties are cool? And who's for combining them with a pair of blue jeans, which is the only clothing item I cannot remember the Doctor has been ever wearing. Will he go back to the tradition of having a favourite intensifier? Or a catchphrase? Sorry, that's more than just one question. But they are exiting ones.

So, I don't care if Peter Capaldi was not on your personal list, or if there may be other, much better people out there, in your opinion. I don't care because ATM I'm too curious to find out how Moffat will make this work.

Friday 2 August 2013

Tennant on Coming Back for the Aniversary

Naturally, with the anniversary special being a bit more than three months away, and the recent interview-frenzy being on the brim of developing a life of its own, it was only a question of time for the first David Tennant interview to show up. This time it's 'SFX' is giving us the honour. 
 
Admittedly, some of the questions are pretty predictable, and none of the answers will stir up the fanbase;  like was he surprised to be asked to come back (nope) and they chat about what it was like to share the role of the Doctor on screen.

Of course, also the 'what about a female Doctor'-question comes up and I love his answer:
You are not going to get a quote from me on that. It will come back and bite me on the arse whatever I say!
Refreshingly, that's the least diplomatic answer I've read the past months. 

Wednesday 31 July 2013

'io9's Comic Con Interview

And, last but not least, also 'io9' did some questioning of the 'Who' cast, with some rather interesting stuff. 

First of all, Moffat promises to tackle some of the yet unanswered questions in this year's Christmas special. Maybe not all, though. However, I'm a bit disappointed that he does not have any plans of bringing River back. We're still waiting to find out why she knows his name. And I thought that Matt Smith's last episode would have been the perfect opportunity for that; with all the hints at the Doctor's name. But maybe that's just the Moff doing what he does best: lying and not giving any teasers away.

Then he talks about the despairing fact of not having learnt anything since 2oo5 when he started writing for 'Doctor Who'. Its episodes are so different form each other that he wonders how he's been able to write so much for 'Who' and every time still needing to figure out anew what's working and what's not.

The second part of 'io9's article is them talking to Matt and Jenna about if and how Clara knowing 'everything' about the Doctor's past (and his future?) changes the relationship between the Doctor and his companion.

Saturday 27 July 2013

Vulture's Matt Smith Interview

Is it already that time of the year when various magazines start to interview the who-is-who of 'Doctor Who'? It seems so, because 'Vutlure's featuring an interview with Matt Smith.

It starts out with him talking about his socks moves on commenting on why he's leaving and how him doing one more season after the Ponds stepped out of the TARDIS has been his plan for quite some time.

There is a sentence about Karen Gillan's new hair - or rather non-hair; Matt seems to have started a trend. There are also the obligatory questions regarding the anniversary and the possibility of Moffat casting an actress as the 12th Doctor. His diplomatic answer:
I don’t see why not. As long as it’s the best actor or actress or fish or otter, it doesn’t matter.
Am I the only one spotting a Benedict Cumberbatch reference in there?

One of the more innovative questions is if he'd been ever confused by Moffat's storylines. Unsurprisingly, his answer is no and he calls it's his 'job to make sense of it'. And even though there are people who may be complaining about Who's complicated storytelling, he asks fans to embrace all the various layers the Mighty Moff has plotted out far in advance as after all, that's  'what we fans of sci-fi want'. I'd have to lie if I said he's wrong.

Additionally, Matt reveals that he'd like to keep the sonic screwdriver and his jacket when leaving. And, among other stuff, he tells the story of how he got involved with 'Doctor Who' and 'How to Catch a Monster'. 

Tuesday 23 July 2013

'Doctor Who' @ 'Nerd HQ'


Maybe one of the most interesting panels (and the longest video I'm going to post) is 'Nerd HQ's Conversation for a Cause; (just in case you're interested, the video starts at 2:10.) And even though it's about as long as a regular 'Doctor Who' episode, it's definitely the most entertaining one you'll find on the net, which makes it worth watching. There are many usual questions but also some more extraordinary ones. I for my part have never heard the story of how the Mighty Moff got involved with writing for 'Doctor Who'.

 Besides, as usual with American interviews, we are nicely reminded that Americans and Britons do not speak the same language. Bucket list, anyone? And I'm really going to miss watching Matt and the Moff teasing each other. They are an entertaining match.

But my personal highlight is when the host asks if they are feeling a responsibility to this cultural phenomenon and Matt's answer is 'yes, because these people get angry if we get it wrong.' I guess that captures the idea of writing for 'Doctor Who' pretty well. I love Moffat still thinking it to be an honour to be a part of Doctor Who.
"Doctor Who will go on perfectly well without all of us".
Now that's a perfectly modest statement coming from the most powerful guy in the Whoniverse.

Besides, calling the Mighty Moff Steven does not sound right, IMHO. Everyone can call themselves Steven. But there's just one Big Moff.

Then there is Moffat saying that he has been always trying to avoid writing scenes in which the Doctor and River are alone in the TARDIS.
"What does that woman do to him the moment the door is shut?"
And the master of all catch-phrases reveals the secret that he's actually not a big fan of them, and that he's trying to avoid them. Those used by Matt's Doctor are entirely Matt's own fault. 

Sunday 21 July 2013

'Doctorw Who' @ Comic Con 2013

When you're a 'Doctor Who' fan one of the most important happenings of a summer is Comic Con. And as this summer is far from earning the attribute 'usual', with us waiting for the new Doctor to be announced and the anniversary crawling nearer and nearer, Comic Con is becoming even more important; after all, maybe, if we're really lucky and the wind stands fair someone may drop a line and give something away. For a change. So let's get started.



In the first video Matt Smith is talking to 'IGN' about the way his Doctor has changed over the past 4 years, the Doctor's playfulness but also about playing his 'dark side'. Matt also mentions the anniversary, and how much he enjoyed working with the other Doctors, John Hurt and David Tennant. And can 'The Final Hour' be the name of this year's Christmas special? It seems possible.  Of course, Matt Smith also has to comment on his successor, and he gives a very diplomatic answer:
Whoever it is will be the right actor or actress. It can be anyone and that's the great things about the part.

Then, there is this interview with Matt Smith and Jenna Coleman done by 'Digital Spy', and this time the questions are why he's leaving now, what he's going to miss the most about playing the Doctor and why 'Doctor Who' has managed to be such a successful show over the past 5o years. And yes, let's forget about it having a 16 years long hiatus. Comic Con is celebrating the success of all stuff nerdy, and not their failings.  

Saturday 20 July 2013

'Sherlock' New's Round-Up

'Fashion&Style' did a great job in summarising the latest developments regarding 'Sherlock'.

The bad news is that due to certain delays in filming (and script writing) it seems we won't get season 3 till 2014.

But, as we have plenty of time at hand to analyse every single detail the 'Sherlock' team is throwing at us, which is remarkably little, it may be of interest that 'F&S' notes
Andrew Scott recently revealed that the “Sherlock” cast has been banned from sharing plot points with friends and family.
Moriarty died in season 2, as we all remember. I guess shooting yourself in the head is as fatal as it can get. So why should Andrew Scott be familiar with plot points of season 3 in the first place? Are we getting flash-backs? Please, don't tell me he survived too, because if yes then Moffat's inability of killing people is getting out of hand. However, the flash-back theory seems to be more likely.

So, let's the wait continue. 

Sunday 14 July 2013

Why Most Fans Are Against a Female Doctor

Even though some newspapers claim that Whovians wouldn't mind having a female Doctor, there are polls suggesting otherwise (87% con, only 13% pro). Now, it shouldn't really matter. In the 21st century we wouldn't care about giving the most powerful weapons of mankind into the neatly manicured hands of a female president, or rather, if we made a poll on having a female president in the USA results would certainly not be this clear.

So, why are we willing to accept the idea of a woman taking the precious seat in the oval office, but at the same time we do not want to have one driving the TARDIS? The short answer to that is that while many women were among those people who'd be for a female president (or at least not against it) there are many women (well, girls) who are against a female Doctor. And that's making a difference.

The longer answer is that most fans, female fans, of 'Who' are not only into this show because of its superb science-fictional quality, or the Mighty Mofff's scripts, or RTD's less brilliant stories. And even though there may be more handsome guys than those people who have been cast as the Doctor, they are still guys and when you're a girl the idea of running away with the Doctor is just more fun when your partner in crime is not another sassy girl.

Of course, there are other less fangirly reasons why fans may be against an actress getting that role. First of all, storywise there is no real reason why he should be she.There may be more clever people proving me wrong, but I cannot think of a scenario which would make it necessary for the Doctor to change gender.

Besides, he's always been a he. The picture you get when hearing the words 'the Doctor in the TARDIS' is not that of a woman in a blue box. I know, this is a self-fulfilling prophecy, but we have been conditioned for 5o years that way  and simply ignoring that fact would be stupid. It's like changing the direction in which you're reading letters. elbissop s'tI. But only because you can do something does not mean you should. 

Maybe one day we'll have a female Doctor. But it seems the whoniverse is not ready for it yet.

'Who's at the Proms

 One reason why I'm sad about Matt Smith leaving is that with the new Doctor we are also going to get a new Doctor's theme. And to me Eleventh's theme is among the most beautiful pieces of (soundtrack) music I've ever heard. Some of Murray Gold's music may be too bombastic for my taste, but most of his recurring themes do what film music is supposed to do: supporting action and not drawing attention away from it. To some Danny Elfman is the king of film music, to me Murray Gold comes a close second at worst.

Having said this it does not come at a surprise that I love having the Proms featuring 'Who's soundtrack. So, without further ado here is the original BBC Radio 3 link where you can listen to part 1 of yesterday's programme (there is a 2nd link for part 2 on that page). And, as it's going to disappear in less than a week WhoniverseMusic's channel is an excellent alternative.



Entertainment Weekly's Moffat Interview

This is Entertainment Weekly's famous Steven Moffat interview in which he actually answers some really interesting questions. 

You don't believe me, right? After reading it my first though was who is that guy and what has he done with the Mighty Moff? Because some answers are so much not like him. Like, the first one: 
EW: When do you hope to announce the identity of the new Doctor? 
Moffat: Unless we have an insane plan, we’ll announce a new Doctor within days of finalizing the new Doctor. Because it’s very very hard to keep any kind of a secret. The last time, when we chose Matt, we had to hold over on that one, because there was a Christmas Doctor Who special called “The Next Doctor” for which Russell was playing the game of pretending it was going to be David Morrissey. So we couldn’t deflate that. [Laughs]. But I think we’ll go public pretty fast.
Moffat is usually the first to admit to have an insane plan. Actually, I would have bet  my 'Doctor Who' DVD box set collection on him trying to keep the name of the actor stepping into Matt Smith's shoes a secret as long as possible (i.e. till Christmas? August 2014?) Well, on a more realistic level, my guess was rather a few weeks after casting him (yes, I'm still ignoring other possibilities for the moment) but not days.

And on that issue, Moffat has officially not ruled out the possibility of having a female Doctor. He says: 
I’m not going to comment at all on the direction we’re going. Sorry!
 The other questions are less exciting, but nonetheless interesting (will Matt Smith have to wear a wig, when and how did Steven Moffat learn about his intentions of leaving, does Moffat have any plans of leaving 'Who', (not yet *whoo-hoo*), what was it like to have two Doctors on one set, just to name some of them). 

And even though I won't post the whole interview, it's worth reading. After all, it's one of those few official statements on all things 'Who' (and some 'Sherlock') we'll get this long summer.

Friday 21 June 2013

The Final Problem - How Did Sherlock Fake His Death?

There's just one more thing, one more thing, one more miracle, Sherlock, for me.
Don't. Be.
Dead.
Going by the evidence of Doyle's original story, the final seconds of Sherlock's last episode and that we know season 3 is going to air some when within this millennia starring Benedict Cumberbatch, you don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to deduct that he must have faked his really realistic looking death in "The Reichenbach Fall". So, the more advanced question is how he did do it.

How does one survive jumping from the top of a building? The answer is, you don't. But assuming that it was possible, it might be logical to say that Molly helped him with it. After all, we see him seeking her help. And when you're Sherlock Holmes, that's not something you'd usually do. And being familiar with Moffat's trolling capabilities that's what he may have been pointing at when saying the clue is all there... However, the episode offers us more than this.

First of all,  let's not forget that Sherlock is the one inviting Moriarty to join him on the rooftop. He's the one setting the when and where. Therefore, it's just logical to assume that he did not show up there without making some preparations.

The night before jumping Sherlock is constantly playing with a rubber ball. And given the fact that John only checks Sherlock's wrist and not his neck for pulse, there is the possibility that he used it to create the illusion that his heart stopped beating. (Of course he's doing it right after jumping off a building, which makes this [if this was real] even more remarkable).

But there is even more. We can assume that Sherlock is telling John Moriarty's lie because he does not want John to suffer. He hopes that by implying how much he betrayed him John will terminate their friendship or at least, he will take things more easily. The last time they see each other he makes John mad at him by implying that he does not care about Mrs Hudson having a possibly life-threatening incident, something he has obviously came up with for this very purpose. Sherlock does not gain anything by this, in fact it hurts his own feelings because John's opinion and his friendship are important to him. Sherlock shows when he has to choose between his reputation and John, that John's the winner. Putting the sentimental aspect of this aside, and focusing on the fact that Sherlock is obviously not wanting to hurt him, he nevertheless asks him a rather inappropriate thing to do: to watch him jump. He wants John to keep his eyes on him, while he's falling.

 There may be several reasons for this request, however, the most rational one is that he does not want John to notice what is happening around him. But before going into further detail, let's focus on the location of Sherlock's 'suicide'.

The  hospital from John's point of view
Looking at the two first pictures on the left we learn the building off which Sherlock jumps has 2 floors.

The red-brick building
Just in case you are wondering if that picture shows the right building, it does. The red-brick base is a second building standing between the hospital and John, from where he watches Sherlock jump This becomes more obvious when we take a look at the situation form Sherlock's point of view
And John from Sherlock's point of view.
(picture 3 on the left).

This fact is interesting because we know that the first thing Sherlock tells John on the phone is precise directions where to stand. And Sherlock wants him to stand behind the red brick building which doesn't allow him to see Sherlock hitting the ground. To get to Sherlock he has to go round it and that's when the cyclist runs into him. This means, that John is not really able to see how Sherlock hits the ground. The brick building is simply blocking his view.

Having settled this point there is also the fact that Sherlock's 'fatal' injuries do not match the way he hits the ground.

When falling we know that Sherlock does not flip. The building has only 2 floors and we see both of them in this picture. It is obvious that it will be his feet which will touch the ground first. Not his head, or torso.

Nevertheless, when John finally sees his friend, he has a head injury. How on earth is it possible to get a head injury when falling like that? It simply does not match, i.e. the head injury is not real.

Sherlock's and the truck's position is wrong.
Taking only the rational aspect of this into account he may have got several other injuries, but he certainly does not damage his head, not like that.

The last thing which may, or may not, require an answer is that in the end Sherlock seems to have rotated 9o°C  between falling and hitting the ground. Knowing that he lands 'on his feet', more or less, there is the possibility that when hitting the ground his weight isn't shifted equally and he falls over. However, there should be noted that even if he falls over his feet have already absorbed most of the impact, i.e. when his head finally touches the ground the result is certainly not such a sever looking injury.

Unfortunately, the only thing which cannot be explained away is the distance between the rooftop and the pavement. Because no matter what, Sherlock has to jump. He has to make the killers believe that he takes his life. Sherlock certainly figures out in advance what Moriarty is up to, the whole conversation on the rooftop is mostly a show. This means that Sherlock could have taken preparations to guarantee himself a somewhat softer landing. But he can't risk doing something obvious*. Maybe the fact that when entering the rooftop he's keeping his hands behind his back has something to do with this. And when standing the first time on the edge he asks Moriarty to give him a moment. Does he really need it? Is it part of the show? Or does he use it to do something else?  Besides, I don't think that Sherlock simply needs Molly to give him a rubber ball and to fake an autopsy. She helped him, somehow. And finding out how she helped him performing his magic trick is the reason why I'm looking forward to the next episode. I know Sherlock Holmes wouldn't agree with this, but I think being able to deduct the whole story would leave us with just too many spoilers.

__
*Yes, there is that truck packed with some soft-looking washing bags, as we can easily see in the last picture... but wouldn't that be too obvious? Besides, if you're comparing it with this picture you'll notice that the truck is standing wrongly. If it had been standing where Sherlock landed, to get into that position afterwards, the driver would have had to backup. Something he certainly did not, given the fact that it would have been much easier not to back up and to drive away.